This post is a part of the Humanist Community at Harvard’s 2012 Blogathon, a 12 hour blogging marathon by Chris Stedman and Chelsea Link to support HCH’s end-of-the-year fundraiser. Chelsea and Chris are both publishing one new post per hour, for twelve hours straight, and none of the posts have been written or drafted in advance. For more blogathon posts, click here. If you enjoyed this post or any of the others, please consider consider chipping in to support our work.

Nerd moment: NASA recently released a free ebook of gorgeous satellite photographs of the Earth. Seriously, it’s stunning – go look at it right now. And, ideally, listen to this while you do. think (get ready for it) that this is a very Humanistic project – and not just because we are all space nerds. (Although I did want to be an astrophysicist when I was younger.) I mean, obviously science and exploration and all that is very Humanist-y. I am all for boldly going to and fro and photographing things and trying to learn more about our world just for the hell of it.

But I also think the artistic aspect of this project is interesting. Many theists would probably look at this and be filled with admiration for the Artist. And so am I.

Of course, where they see God’s handiwork, I see gravity, erosion, refraction, condensation, subduction – a beautiful and chaotic dance of laws and accidents. Nobody can take credit for the creation.

But what does deserve admiration is the idea to turn accident into art. The Earth is a work of art, not because somebody designed it that way, but because we humans had the insight to find beauty in the amazing mess.

Chelsea Link is the Campus Organizing Fellow at the Humanist Community at Harvard.

5 comments on “Creation

  1. Pingback: Creation | NonProphet Status

  2. Pingback: NOMA? No Thanks | The Humanist Community Project

  3. Pingback: Accidental Traditions | The Humanist Community Project

  4. Pingback: Blogathon 2012 Recap, or, A Supposedly Fun Thing We’ll Never Do Again | The Humanist Community Project

  5. Is it a mistake to associate a theist’s view of the physical planet as necessarily the work of a creator God(s)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>